Thursday, December 19, 2019

Appropriate and Inapropriate Technology in the Agriculture...

QUESTION: Zambia uses both appropriate and inappropriate technology in various sectors. Choose one sector of your choice, identify and discuss both appropriate and inappropriate technology being used in that sector. Originality and practical examples are encouraged in your easy. Zambia uses both appropriate and inappropriate technology in various sectors. This approach has had both negative and positive impact on Zambia’s efforts to development. And so, for us to appreciate this impact, let focus on one key sector of the economy where appropriate and inappropriate technology is used .In this paper I shall focus on this agricultural sector as the area of research. In the first place, I shall focus on establishing the working definition†¦show more content†¦As such it scores little or no success. Instead, the community ends up complaining and even protesting against the use of such technology. (Akuffo 2006) acknowledges that technological waken are daunting problems of establishing peace, ensuring justice, sustaining a safe environment, problems that technology alone can never solve. Having established a working definition, I will put the discussion into the context of the Zambian agricultural sector. It must say from the on-set that Zambia has used both appropriate and inappropriate technology in various sector of her economy. All this has been done with the quest to develop and better the lives of her people. The agricultural sector is one of such sector when both appropriate and inappropriate technology has been used. Since the 1970’s, Zambia has relied on simple, relatively inexpensive Agricultural research programme to enhance agricultural productivity. (Bezuneh 2005) mentions that in early stages of research programmes, research was conducted in order to develop productivity through enhancing technologies ( i.e. Fertilizer pesticide and capital intensive crops). One appropriate technology that was used in the agricultural sector was the introduction of oxen power for tillage. The usage of such technology was availed to small scale farmers in the Eastern, Southern and Central province.

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Why Are Mommy and Daddy Fighting free essay sample

An analysis of the tension between the gods in Homers Iliad. This paper details some of the conflicts that occur between the Olympian hosts while the battles rage below them, and how those conflict are both caused by and influence the decisions of mortal man. The battle between the gods starts in full force in book twenty-one, but it is actually precipitated by the gods entering of the Achaean/Trojan fray in the previous book. Up to that point, they had not actually battled for or against the Trojans legally, every time someone stepped in on either side, one of the higher-up gods such as Zeus or Hera would get angry. Its almost as if a huge spring of godly tension has been coiling and coiling, and Zeus releases the tension in book twenty-one when he steps up and acknowledges to Poseidon that he understands the needs of the gods to interfere with the conflict below and gives them free reign to do so. We will write a custom essay sample on Why Are Mommy and Daddy Fighting? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

The negative effects of cartoons characters Essays - Brothers Grimm

The negative effects of cartoons characters The characters in cartoons affect the children negatively.Studies show that cartoons,which are based on fighting,jumping,kicking,killing etc., are watched by children .Moreover they may not be able to differentiate the real life.For example,in England a girl was four years old who was affected by favorite cartoon character,Go Diego Go,and she want to swing like this character.She fastened with her hairband and transmitted to her neck.After all she died by drowning.Such as when jerry is fighting with Tom kids like it.Then tehy like Spiderman who can jump from here and there,and also climb any high wall, which is very risk for children .Bec ause sometimes to become a Spiderman kids jump from a high palce like from a chair or bed which is very bad and sometimes they get hurt.Moreover these cartoons characters cause malnutrition.According to research conducted in England some cartoons characters affect negatively children?s nutrition.For example Shrek,Bratz;Simpsons and Pink Panther are used on the package of greasy ,candied,salty etc. Foods.By this way these foods are attracted attention of children and so they want to eat these foods.In conclusion the children imitate cartoons characters and also they are affected badly them.these characters have not positive impact on children.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Interpreting God

Introduction Every culture and religion has its own unique traditions, views, and ways of living and as such, it comes as no surprise that such a divergence would also include unique perspectives on God and his inherent relationship with humanity.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Interpreting God specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In this paper what will be explored are the different perspectives of Christianity, Islam and Judaism regarding God and how these views factor into their fundamental understanding of their relationship with God. It is expected that by the end of this paper readers will be able to learn of unique facets of each individual religion and how their views are formed in light of their individual interpretations of the Almighty. Rejection of the Holy Trinity and Jesus as the Son of Man One of the fundamental tenets of the Christian faith is its focus on the holy trinity which is composed of G od the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit each aspect, while separate, is part of God as a greater whole and thus comprises the fundamental interpretation of God under Christian Theology. For Islam, such an interpretation goes against its fundamental concept of monotheism referred to as tawhid. This is not to say that the Christian faith is centered on a belief in a triumvirate of three distinct Gods rather under Christian theology the holy trinity is the manner in which God chooses to reveal himself to humanity and each aspect delves into a particular nature of his being. For Christians the Holy Trinity cannot be considered distinct separate parts of the whole but rather a combined being with aspects that are beyond human comprehension to successfully interpret and are thus perceived as three distinct aspects of one single entity. Under the Islamic faith such a view can be considered blasphemous since it is an affront to the Muslim concept of Shahadah which is a creed in I slam which states that God is a unique and indivisible being (Volf, 20). In this case the Holy Trinity is thus viewed as polytheistic since under Islam God cannot be separated into different aspects but rather is a unique whole that cannot be separated (Volf, 20). In fact, it is based on this particular view that Islam rejects the idea of Jesus Christ as the son of God since under the tawhid there is but one God and is thus incomparable, indivisible and is not part of humanity at all. Judaism has a similar stance regarding God being indivisible and not having multiple persons within the same deity, in fact, such a view reflects the same tenets as the â€Å"oneness† described in Islamic texts which place an emphasis on the â€Å"oneness† and uniqueness of the Lord (Novak, 17). Such a view may explain the initial reaction of the Pharisees regarding Jesus as the son of God since for them God cannot be divisible into different aspects (The Gospel according To St. Mark, 1 à ¢â‚¬â€œ 50).Advertising Looking for term paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This particular view goes against the Christian view that Jesus was the son of God that died for our sins and thus redeemed us all (The Gospel According To St. Mark, 1 – 50). To accept the Islamic view regarding an indivisible God is to reject the very basis of Christianity which is largely based upon the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the Holy Trinity as the basis for its faith (Sumney, 329). For Christians, Jesus really was the son of God born through the miracle of Immaculate Conception in order to redeem the sins of humanity. Christianity and Islam actually do agree that Jesus was sent by God but Islam argues that Jesus was merely a messenger and not divine while Christianity focuses on the divinity of Jesus as the cornerstone of its faith (Chappel, Woelfel, Auerbach, Buller, Chapter 7). To accept the Christian vi ew is to call into question the â€Å"oneness† or indivisible nature of God which is also at the core of the Islamic faith. The Presence of God in All Things It is at this point that the divisiveness of both faiths is apparent and is even more pronounced when examining their individual interpretations over the presence of God. Under Christian theology it is stated that God is present in all things and in fact dwells within us all. On the other hand Islam states that God is independent of his creation and thus is not present within our worldly domain. While both religions acknowledge the fact that God has no beginning and has no end (as seen in the works of St. Thomas Aquinas and the Qur’an) the fact remains that each has a different way of perceiving how God brought about all of creation. The Islamic faith in a God that is independent of his creation has actually been conceptualized in the clockmaker theory which specifically states that while God created the Universe he is actually not actively involved in its operation which is similar to how a clock works independently of the clockmaker that made it. Such a theoretical perspective can actually also be seen in the works of St. Thomas Aquinas which advocates the intelligent design of creation and the first mover theory. In this particular approach the complexity of creation itself as well as its overall functionality entails intelligent design in its creation, thus, if there is an intelligent design there must be a designer. Furthermore the assertion of St. Thomas Aquinas that all objects are in motion because they were set into motion by another action or entity entails that there must have bene a first entity that set everything into motion yet he himself must not have been moved. Taking this into consideration, the Christian perspective entails that creation comes from God, is caused by God and thus God is a part of it (Navone, 24). Under Islam while God may have conceived of creation he did so independently from directly acting on it and merely willed it (commanded it in some interpretations) into being (Chappel, Woelfel, Auerbach, Buller, Chapter 9).Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Interpreting God specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Thus, from the Islamic point of view, the first mover theorem is somewhat altered in that God never directly interacted with matter but rather willed it into being which is drastically different from the Christian perspective of direct interaction. This particular difference is important to point out since it sets the tone for how Christianity and Islam interpret God in creation. Since God was the first mover in Christianity and under the Christian perspective God created the Universe in stages God is thus present in every aspect of creation including ourselves (Navone, 24). Such a viewpoint is similarly reflected in Judaic theology and as such shows how both religi ons have similar origin stories. Under the Islamic perspective, since God willed (or commanded) the Universe into being he may have created it but he did it all at once and did not directly interact with it, thus he is not present within creation. In fact, when looking at the various accounts written within the Qur’an it can be seen that Allah chooses to make his message known through intermediaries rather than through direct interaction which further solidifies the notion that God does not interact with this plane of existence (Chappel, Woelfel, Auerbach, Buller, Chapter 9). Based on this the Islamic faith calls into question the divinity of Jesus since from their perspective God doesn’t directly interact with creation since he is independent of it. On the other hand since Christianity believes that creation came from God and is a part of God then it makes sense that he would choose to directly interact with it. Alternatively when examining the Judaic concept of God i t can be seen that it holds a similar concept regarding the creation of the Universe and God’s role in it. Judaic text specifically indicate that God is able to intervene in the world and as such this places the Judaic view regarding creationism and God’s place in the universe as being quite similar to the Christian understanding of God. It must be noted though that large aspects of the Jewish tradition were in fact, borrowed by Christianity as the basis of its religion and this can be seen in the old testament of the Bible itself. The difference begins starting from the New Testament onwards and how Christianity views God as a being composed of the Holy Trinity while Judaism outright rejects such a concept. As such, it can be seen that in all three religions there are aspects which are both similar and dissimilar. These particular views set the stage for interpreting Gods relationship with humanity since the difference in the presence of God in all things or the absen ce of God in our reality changes the interpretation of our relationship with God.Advertising Looking for term paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More God Created Man in His Image Within Christian theology, it is often said that man was created in God’s image and it due to this that man is unique among all other creatures within creation. In fact, it is this â€Å"uniqueness† that sets man apart from everything else that becomes the basis by which man has justified his domination over all aspects of the world today. For Islam God is incomparable and independent of creation and thus man has not been created in his image since God is beyond comprehension and thus cannot possibly resemble anything he created in any way. It is due to this that Islam outright rejects the ideas of Christianity regarding the resemblance of man to God. On the other hand Christian theology states that â€Å"created in his image† does not necessarily mean looking exactly like God but rather it can be described more along the lines of possessing his characteristics. Such a view is actually also expressed in Judaic texts and as such shows the theological basis of the Christian interpretation over what the statement â€Å"created in his image† means. Image can thus be interpreted as possessing qualities that God himself exemplifies such as being merciful, charitable, kind, compassionate, loving, creative, innovative and constantly seeing the good in people. In this regard Christian theology clarifies such misconceptions regarding the difference between â€Å"physical resemblances† to â€Å"mental resemblance† in that to be created in the image of God is to have the capacity to utilize his â€Å"image† or â€Å"model of behavior† in our daily life. Interpreting God’s Relationship with Man based on Religion One of the current misinterpretations regarding Islam is the allegations by non-Muslim groups that Allah can be described as a stern and cruel God whose rules and messages need to be obeyed fully and without alteration. Such a view is actually quite far from truth and in fac t, evidence to the contrary is reflected in the Qur’an in nearly all chapters where they state that Allah is kind, merciful and compassionate. In a manner of speaking the relationship between God and Muslims is one akin to a kind master and dutiful servant wherein the rules are expected to be followed and as a direct result God rewards such actions in the afterlife. It is not necessarily a relationship of constant prostration, subservience and fear but rather one where it is understood that for each action comes either a reward or punishment and as such it is better to follow the rules as stated by Allah rather than anger him. In the case of Christianity, aspects related to mercy, forgiveness and reward are also apparent however instead of a master and servant relationship it seems more akin to either a Sheppard and his sheep or a kind father to his children. In this particular case it is seen God has an open heart towards sinners wherein forgiveness is readily given and that God loves all whether that individual may be a devout follower or sinner. While Christianity does share several aspects related to Islam regarding following the set rules established by God the difference lies in how stringently such aspects are applied and how emphasis is placed on the fact that despite violations to the set rules God, in Christianity’s eyes, is all too willing to forgive and bring the lost sheep back into the flock, a common theme in many bible stories. Under Judaism it is stated that humans have a direct relationship with God in that God cares about humanity in the same way that humanity cares about God however in a distinct departure from both Islamic and Christian text it is stated by Judaism that people’s actions do not actually affect God positively or negatively. This particular view has its basis on the fact that since God is so mighty and omnipotent how can the actions of one man affect him positively or negatively? Thus, from this particula r view a person’s actions will lead him to good or bad ends and it is better to follow the teachings of God and be good in order for one’s life to be full of blessings. From this particular perspective the relationship between God and man is seen to be somewhat different than a master and servant, or Sheppard and sheep but seems to be more along the lines of a teacher and student. Works Cited Chappel, Sarah, James Woelfel, Stephen Auerbach, and Rachel Buller. Patterns in  Western Civilization. 4th. Kansas: 2007. Print. Navone, John. â€Å"The Creator’s Presence And Activity In Creation.† Homiletic Pastoral  Review 111.2 (2010): 24. MasterFILE Complete. Web. Novak, Michael. â€Å"Another Islam.† First Things: A Monthly Journal Of Religion Public  Life 127 (2002): 17. Academic Search Premier. Web. Sumney, Jerry L. â€Å"The Place of 1 Corinthians 9†¦24-27 In Paul’s Argument.† Journal Of  Biblical Literature 119.2 (2000): 329. Academic Search Premier. Web. The Gospel According To St. Mark : Authorized (King James) Version. Project Gutenberg, n.d. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. Volf, Miroslav. â€Å"Allah and the Trinity.† Christian Century 128.5 (2011): 20. MasterFILE  Premier. Web. This term paper on Interpreting God was written and submitted by user Kathleen Ball to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Essay on Vocabulary Development

Essay on Vocabulary Development Essay on Vocabulary Development Constructing Meaning Susan L. Wright Grand Canyon University: EED475 November 18, 2012 Constructing Meaning |Strategy |Activity |Assessment | |Inferencing |Make predictions through illustrations, chapter |Decide if predictions can be substantiated | | |titles, and headings | | ; Define through |Observe student during the process to ensure correct use | | |context clues, dictionary or glossary. |of strategy. | |Summarizing |Discuss what student learned from reading the | Story mapping or write a summary in journal | | |text | | |Question Generating |Have students write questions in journal after |Look for appropriate answers to the questions | | |predicting; before they read | | that promote images|Draw a picture of a selected character of scene in the | | |in their head |text | |Recognizing story structure |Identify the characters, setting, problem etc†¦ |Fill out story map | |Activating prior knowledge |Ask what student knows about topic |Self to text, world to text, or text to text connection | | | |worksheet | |Monitoring Comprehension |Reread when something doesn’t make sense |Have student identify what helped clarify meaning | |Think Aloud |Stop after reading a part of text; model asking |Invite students to do the same activity | | |yourself questions | | |Main Idea |Discuss main idea; the point the author wants to|Observe, after reading discuss the main idea in small | | |make. Use a familiar text as an example |groups. Check for understanding. | |Fix-up |Student explains misunderstanding, classmates |Student answers to questions | | |ask questions to help clarify |

Thursday, November 21, 2019

System Analysis and Design Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

System Analysis and Design - Assignment Example The technique employs models that can perform one function at a time. The flexibility of tackling numerous project functions at a time is limited. The traditional approach traverses numerous phases. The software upkeep practices in this approach are multifarious. Special techniques apply in access codes for the development of efficient IT systems. The analysis segment in the software development entails an in-depth comprehension of the desires of the end user. The elucidations for the design of the models in this approach require the compatibility of the foci subjects. The design of the model depends on the on the experience and the acquaintance of the software designer. The object-oriented approach is preferable as a system development technique. The object-oriented system is flexible to changing design prerequisites and allows the recycle of codes. This approach creates a system in which the different models function together in software development. This approach centers on information and functionality while the traditional approach centers on system functions. There would be ease in utilizing the object-oriented approach. Flexibility and efficient utilization of software resources mark the advantage of the object-oriented system over the traditional approach. The object-oriented approach includes the most common programming languages such as Java. These languages are easier to comprehend as the center on the subject. The structured analysis methods are older than the object-oriented approach. Large firms operating enormous software systems utilize structural analysis methods to efficiently run their systems. They offer the principles requisite for understanding software development. The old and new generations understand the operation of the structured analysis method.Â